Value & Evidence Leaders: Let's Connect

At Achieve Life Sciences, we're preparing for the potential launch of cytisinicline, a new treatment approach for smoking cessation and vaping cessation.

As we build toward launch, we're thinking carefully about what the evidence needs to look like across the full ecosystem: payers, Medicaid, government and public health programs, health systems and 340B entities, and employers. The audiences are not interchangeable, and neither are the materials.

We're looking for a quarterback. Someone to direct the clinical, epidemiological, and economic evidence packages, understand each one well enough to challenge it, and position it for the right audience in the right sequence. Not a modeler in chief. Someone who knows this territory, sees how the pieces connect, and can move quickly.

The question underneath all of it:

What evidence does a product need, for which audience, and in what sequence?

You may be someone who has:

• Built an integrated evidence strategy across HEOR, RWE, PROs, and health services research
• Worked in primary care, population health, vaccines, or another high-volume/public health category
• Developed value dossiers, budget impact tools, and evidence for formulary and payer decision-makers
• Navigated the economic case where the payer, the provider, and the beneficiary are three different parties
• Published in peer-reviewed literature and can move comfortably between scientific detail and access strategy
• Led external partners and budgets while still being able to challenge a model line by line
• Partnered across Medical Affairs, Commercial, Legal, and Government Affairs, and knows which evidence belongs in a payer dossier, which belongs in a peer-reviewed manuscript, and which belongs in neither
• Built something from the ground up rather than stepping into an established infrastructure
• Or maybe none of that describes you, and we still want to talk.

Maybe you are a

• Researcher who has spent years on smoking, vaping, or addiction and has never carried an HEOR title
• Clinician who knows how to construct an argument and has watched good evidence die somewhere between the publication and the decision
• Epidemiologist or health services researcher who wants the work to actually move coverage, guidelines, and practice

Maybe you have

• Worked in perioperative or oncology care and have seen what happens to outcomes when someone keeps smoking through treatment
• Been executing someone else's evidence plan inside a large organization and you want to write one
• Maybe you want your next chapter to be about the leading cause of preventable death (smoking) and one of the fastest growing public health problems we have (vaping).
• We're particularly interested in people who are strategic enough to see the whole evidence architecture and hands-on enough to know when the details don't hold up.
• This isn't about having every box checked. We're interested in meeting people who have built evidence strategies in complex, broad-population environments, or who have the judgment to build one here for the first time.
• If this sounds like you, we'd love to hear from you and share more about what we're building.
• #LI-AW1